John Soennichsen, Writer
  • Home
  • John's Bio
  • Death Valley
  • Bretz's Flood
  • Chinese-Americans
  • Channeled Scablands
  • Fiction
  • Events
  • Blog

What You Can't Say About Hillary

3/27/2015

3 Comments

 


When the New York Times’ Amy Chozick received an email from a Hillary Clinton support group called HRC Super Volunteers, she couldn’t believe their veiled threat: "We will be watching, reading, listening and protesting coded sexism..." In the same email was a list of words and phrases not to be used to describe the polarizing Hillary Clinton.

Not only did this calculating group of Clinton supporters prove that the Clinton camp will do anything to win, but they were quite ambitious in assuming that any reporter would stop using certain phrases to describe the disingenuous and inevitable Democratic front runner.

What will certainly follow will be an insincere claim by Ms. Clinton that her supporters are entitled to their opinions, but that reporters are out of touch with her if they think she would approve such a message. To be sure, the HRC Super Volunteers seem over-confident that their threats carry any weight, but these backers of the secretive Clinton will likely continue to use political techniques that represent the past.

Fortunately, most reporters use a thesaurus, which means that “disingenuous” can become “hypocritical,” “inevitable” can be changed to “preordained,” and “ambitious” can be replaced with “determined.”

If only Hillary Clinton could be so easily replaced with another nominee.


3 Comments
CostumeLook link
6/9/2015 05:30:07 am

Can be.

Reply
John Soennichsen
6/9/2015 06:00:45 am

Thanks for your comments, CostumeLook

My use of the word "could" was based on tips offered by the Oxford Dictionary online:

When talking about what is possible in a given situation, or about an opportunity that is open to someone, use can or be able to:

By joining a club or gym, you can meet so many people.

Parents can save money by booking their holiday outside the peak season.

I can go to London tomorrow as I’ve got the day off.

We use could to talk about less definite aspects of possibility or suggested options, either now or in the future:

We could go for a walk now and then have dinner.

There could be a storm later.

She could be in line for a top government job.

It would be acceptable to use can in the first example, where a suggestion is being discussed (We can go for a walk now…), but this would make the suggestion or option more definite. It’s not idiomatic English to use can in the second and third examples though, which refer to a hypothetical future situation which, although possible, may well not happen

Reply
Nancy Van Leuven link
1/23/2016 10:47:06 pm

Hi, John! Great to see all your works and online presence! And yeah, it's offensive that candidate groups threaten media; however, I also think that overt sexism is a very real problem, especially with the hyper-masculinized rhetoric of the GOP. Do I see a solution? Nope, but it's sure important to talk about!

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Okay, so I haven't had a blog until now. But my agent tells me I need a blog. My publisher tells me I need a blog. Readers tell me they want a blog. So here it is, soon to be filled with updates, news, observations, gripes, more observations, questions, answers, absurdly conceived commentary, and other items that seem to have ne better home. Stay tuned!

    Archives

    September 2016
    September 2015
    March 2015
    January 2014
    August 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.